British Royal Couple Want Privacy For Baby’s Birth

Prince William and Catherine, the Duchess of Cambridge, are trying to find ways to limit publicity about the upcoming birth of their child, who will be third in line for the throne of Great Britain.

After royal birth, a labor for privacy

The Search For Privacy

After royal birth, a labor for privacy

The Search For Privacy

By Anthony Faiola

Washington Post

LONDON — Outside the private Lindo Wing of St. Mary’s Hospital, the global media hordes on Royal Baby Watch have marked their turf with duct tape and stepladders like so many predators. But starved for material in a world where Mother Nature and Buckingham Palace are the last two holdouts from the 24-hour news cycle, loitering reporters trying to set a tone of breathless anticipation have resorted to interviewing each other.

Perhaps nothing could be more appropriate. As Prince William and his wife, Catherine , the Duchess of Cambridge — formerly known as Kate Middleton — prepare to carve out a new life for their budding family in the glare of the spotlight, the press is poised to be a major part of the story.

The scene here amounts to a déjà vu of June 22, 1982. Then, another young couple — Prince Charles and Diana, Princess of Wales — stepped out of the same wing of the same hospital with an infant William and into what would become a stormy, love-hate relationship with the press (and each other) that would come to define palace politics for decades. Some — including, reportedly, William — still blame the media for Diana’s 1997 death in a Paris car crash during a chase with rabid paparazzi.

To be sure, the British tabloid press is a different beast today, as is the palace PR machine, with one more tame and self-restraining and the other far more professional and controlling. Nevertheless, the media and inquiring minds on both sides of the Atlantic might be in for a rude awakening as they clamor for a piece of the glamorous couple after baby makes three.

After a brief choreography for the cameras as the couple leave the lavish hospital wing with their newborn, royal watchers say they might disappear for while, or least try. The move to escape the public eye as they set about becoming parents could mark the beginning of what observers are describing as an attempt by the couple to build a far more private life than the one constructed by William’s parents.

“This will be very different from watching William grow up, and it has a lot to do with the characters this time around,” said Roy Greenslade, former editor of the Daily Mirror and now a journalism professor at City University in London. “William hates the press and will show even less accommodation once the baby is born, and Kate, unlike Diana, is clearly very shy of doing anything that would breach palace secrecy.”

Kate Is Popular

For the press, any retrenchment by the young couple couldn’t come at a worst time. Cover stories and inside montages of Shopping Kate, Official Kate, even Dog-Walking Kate have driven print sales and online hits in a manner not seen since Diana’s heyday. The feeding has been no less frenzied in the United States. Since 2011’s blockbuster royal wedding, the Duchess has graced the cover of People magazine more times than any other celebrity.

When innocuous and orchestrated — say, a Will-and-Kate wand duel at the Harry Potter Studio Tour outside London — that publicity is just what the doctor ordered for a House of Windsor looking to endear a 21st-century monarchy to the public. But royal coverage has, at least in the palace’s eyes, veered dangerously off course on occasion, suggesting the thin ice separating now from the days of behind-the-bushes press. 

Photo by Getty

Think, for example, Unauthorized Photos of Topless Kate, as seen last year in the gossiping press from Paris to New York. Even British publications, cowed after Diana’s death and facing a massive public backlash from a phone-hacking scandal, has skirted the line. Recently, the Daily Mail sicked no less than three reporters on the Duchess’s home turf of Berkshire to sniff out details on royal-baby cravings that only the most lurid reader would demand to know. (Okay, okay. Sour candies and vegetable curry.)
The challenge domestically to keeping a lid on the helicopter flyovers and bugged baby buggies, said Richard Palmer, royal correspondent for the Daily Express, is the wild card of foreign competition at a time when the couple have reached beyond even Hollywoodesque celebrity.
Press Rules Different
Limits in Britain on reporting that a woman is pregnant before she reaches her 12th week, for example, meant that U.S. commentators were buzzing about the “royal baby bump” before the domestic press could seriously enter the fray. And in a world where European and American tabloids unbeholden to the palace don’t always play by the rules — and where everyone with a smartphone is a potential paparazzo — the British press is fearing the worst. Will the casual shots offered up by the palace of the Duchess walking Lupo, her black cocker spaniel, on the grounds of Kensington Palace be sharply cut back once she’s walking with a stroller instead?
“We’re treading a tightrope all the time with the royal couple, and that’s only going to get thinner with the baby,” Palmer said. “One of the things we worry about is that we’re very unlikely to run snatched pictures of the baby in the coming months, but what happens if the Australians and the Americans do? When readers can go anywhere now, how will that hurt us?”

The Search for Privacy

By Anthony Faiola

Washington Post

 In the search for privacy, Prince William and Catherine, the Duchess of Cambridge, might be swimming against the tide.
Whereas the notion of a fairy tale and, later, a train wreck of a relationship drove public interest in Charles and Diana, the image of a modern young couple — at once accessible and a world apart, and seemingly able to do no wrong — appear to be driving the story. That interest seems set only to grow after the addition of the littlest Windsor.
Compounding that is commercial pressure for every detail of their life. A photo of the Duchess leaving a retail store with a white baby basket sent sales of similar items soaring. Ditto after the mere whiff of a rumor that she had chosen a sky-blue stroller. Pundits have called on her to “set an example” to women everywhere by breast-feeding. And the hot story line is that she isn’t “too posh to push” — as some had suggested — and will opt for natural childbirth. The question, many here say, is where to draw the line between reasonable privacy and duty to chronicle the royal family?
In some ways, William’s upbringing might be a model for a modern couple who most view as wanting to follow a path similar to Diana’s — she fiercely guarded the privacy of her sons but also wanted them to grow up as normal as possible. She took them on outings to McDonald’s and Disneyland. And unlike Charles, who went to a boarding school in Scotland, she and Charles sent William to the closer, if still quintessentially highbrow, Eton College near London. While William was at Eton, the family struck a deal with the tabloid press: They would back off in exchange for periodic updates on his life.
But will those periodic updates be quite as periodic with the baby, who will be third in line to the throne, regardless of the sex? During William’s early years, Arthur Edwards, a dean of the royal press corps who works for London’s Sun newspaper and is credited with a number of the most famous shots of Diana, recalls regular press calls by the palace for photo opportunities with William. There was the baptism. The day he took his first steps. His first international trip. But while Will and Kate will need and probably want a photo documentary of the life of a child who would be monarch, Edwards and others believe those calls are likely to be fewer and farther between.
“I don’t think we will get quite that access,” he said. “I suspect they will be more private.”

This is a test

This is a test.
I want to post a link.

APS Educators Still Arriving At Jail

Five more of the 35 educators indicted in the Atlanta Public Schools cheating scandal have arrived at the Fulton County Jail Wednesday, one day after the deadline for reporting to be booked.
Hall, others report to Fulton County Jail
What’s next in APS criminal case
Atlanta Public Schools

Hall, others report to the Fulton County Jail

By Mike Morris and Mark Niesse

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution 

What's Next for APS Criminal Case

After just missing Tuesday’s midnight deadline to turn themselves in to authorities, four more of the 35 educators indicted in the Atlanta PublicSchools cheating scandal were booked into the Fulton County Jail early Wednesday. Another defendant arrived at the jail after daybreak Wednesday.
Dana Evans, Millicent Few, Diane Buckner Webb and Shani Robinson were booked into the jail after the midnight deadline, according to online jail records. Just before 8:30 a.m., Willie Davenport walked into the jail accompanied by her attorney.
That left just three of the 35 teachers, testing coordinators and school administrators - Lucious Brown, Clarietta Davis and Lera Middlebrook - that had still not surrendered at the jail as of 8:30 a.m. Wednesday, according to jail spokeswoman Tracy Flanagan.
Just after 7:30 p.m. Tuesday, former Atlanta schools superintendent Beverly Hall, walked into the jail surrounded by her legal team. Hall, 66, flashed a slight smile but did not comment, on the advice of her attorneys.

Hall Mug Shot

Shortly before Hall arrived, top administrators, Tamara Cotman, Sharon Davis-Williams and Michael Pitts, came to the jail with a throng of lawyers and friends.
All of those who have turned themselves in, with the exception of Donald Bullock, have been released from jail on bond, Flanagan told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution at daybreak Wedensday.
Tuesday was the deadline set by Fulton County District Attorney Paul Howard for all of the accused to turn themselves in.
Some of the educators spent several hours in jail before posting bond amounts starting at $40,000.
Hall’s bond is $200,000 bond. A grand jury had recommended a $7.5 million bond, but that amount was reduced after negotiations with prosecutors.
“I don’t think there was really any serious entertainment of that,” said her attorney, David J. Bailey.
Teachers booked
Teachers moved from the school house to the jailhouse when they allowed themselves to be fingerprinted and taken into custody.
Three teachers from Humphries Elementary surrendered to authorities on charges of racketeering, making false statements and theft by taking.
Lisa Terry, Ingrid Abella-Sly and Wendy Ahmed are accused of altering standardized test scores in 2009 and then accepting bonus money based on the falsified test results. Abella-Sly and Ahmed both misled Georgia Bureau of Investigation agents when they claimed they didn’t have knowledge of anyone giving students answers to the Criterion-Referenced Competency Tests.
At Parks Middle School, teacher Starlette Mitchell is accused of committing similar crimes, including making false statements to investigators. Her bond was originally $400,000, but negotiations with Howard resulted in her bond shrinking to $50,000 after she agreed to a gag order prohibiting her from speaking to the media about the case, said her attorney Gerald Griggs.
He also represents Angela Williamson, a former teacher at Dobbs Elementary. Williamson was the first educator to win an appeal for her job before an Atlanta Public Schools tribunal last June, but she lost a second tribunal in December after the district attorney’s office produced new evidence.
“They want everyone to know they are innocent and will fight this vigorously,” Griggs said.
Williamson’s bond was initially set at $500,000, but it was reduced to $60,000.
The attorney for teacher Francis Mack, Torris Butterfield, said his client did not cheat. “She gave not one, not two but three statements and she never changed her story,” he said.
Testing coordinators held
Former Benteen Elementary School testing coordinator Theresia Copeland was checked into the jail on charges of racketeering, theft and making false statements.
Copeland allegedly collected a bonus check based on falsified test results and misled investigators when she said she wasn’t involved in cheating, according to the indictment.
Her attorney, Warren Fortson, said he wants to Copeland’s $1 million bond to be reduced.
“I think this whole thing has turned into something rather ridiculous,” Fortson told reporters outside the jail. “They didn’t treat Al Capone like this.”
Fortson said a bond is meant to ensure that a defendant appears at trial.
“I would be very hopeful that a judge would look at it and say, ‘I don’t think that a Cobb County grandmamma needs … $1 million to secure that she will be here,’” he said.
Former Parks Middle School testing coordinator Sandra Ward received a $50,000 bond on charges of racketeering and making false statements.
The indictment claims Ward falsified students’ answer sheets on standardized tests and then took bonus money based on the inflated test scores.