By
Anthony Faiola
Washington
Post
LONDON — Outside the private Lindo Wing
of St. Mary’s Hospital, the global media hordes on Royal Baby Watch have marked
their turf with duct tape and stepladders like so many predators. But starved
for material in a world where Mother Nature and Buckingham Palace are the last
two holdouts from the 24-hour news cycle, loitering reporters trying to set a
tone of breathless anticipation have resorted to interviewing each other.
Perhaps nothing could be more
appropriate. As Prince
William and his wife, Catherine , the Duchess of Cambridge — formerly known
as Kate Middleton — prepare to carve out a new life for their budding family in
the glare of the spotlight, the press is poised to be a major part of the
story.
The scene here amounts to a déjà vu
of June 22, 1982. Then, another young couple — Prince Charles and Diana,
Princess of Wales — stepped out of the same wing of the same hospital with an
infant William and into what would become a stormy, love-hate relationship with
the press (and each other) that would come to define palace politics for
decades. Some — including, reportedly, William — still blame the media for
Diana’s 1997 death in a Paris car crash during a chase with rabid paparazzi.
To be sure, the British tabloid
press is a different beast today, as is the palace PR machine, with one more
tame and self-restraining and the other far more professional and controlling.
Nevertheless, the media and inquiring minds on both sides of the Atlantic might
be in for a rude awakening as they clamor for a piece of the glamorous couple
after baby makes three.
After a brief choreography for the
cameras as the couple leave the lavish hospital wing with their newborn, royal
watchers say they might disappear for while, or least try. The move to escape
the public eye as they set about becoming parents could mark the beginning of
what observers are describing as an attempt by the couple to build a far more
private life than the one constructed by William’s parents.
“This will be very different from
watching William grow up, and it has a lot to do with the characters this time
around,” said Roy Greenslade, former editor of the Daily Mirror and now a
journalism professor at City University in London. “William hates the press and
will show even less accommodation once the baby is born, and Kate, unlike
Diana, is clearly very shy of doing anything that would breach palace secrecy.”
Kate Is Popular
For the press, any retrenchment by
the young couple couldn’t come at a worst time. Cover stories and inside
montages of Shopping Kate, Official Kate, even Dog-Walking Kate have driven
print sales and online hits in a manner not seen since Diana’s heyday. The feeding
has been no less frenzied in the United States. Since 2011’s blockbuster royal
wedding, the Duchess has graced the cover of People magazine more times than
any other celebrity.
When innocuous and orchestrated —
say, a Will-and-Kate wand duel at the Harry Potter Studio Tour outside London —
that publicity is just what the doctor ordered for a House of Windsor looking
to endear a 21st-century monarchy to the public. But royal coverage has, at
least in the palace’s eyes, veered dangerously off course on occasion,
suggesting the thin ice separating now from the days of behind-the-bushes
press.
Photo by Getty |
The challenge domestically to keeping a lid on the helicopter flyovers and bugged baby buggies, said Richard Palmer, royal correspondent for the Daily Express, is the wild card of foreign competition at a time when the couple have reached beyond even Hollywoodesque celebrity.
Press Rules Different
Limits in Britain on reporting that a woman is pregnant before she reaches her 12th week, for example, meant that U.S. commentators were buzzing about the “royal baby bump” before the domestic press could seriously enter the fray. And in a world where European and American tabloids unbeholden to the palace don’t always play by the rules — and where everyone with a smartphone is a potential paparazzo — the British press is fearing the worst. Will the casual shots offered up by the palace of the Duchess walking Lupo, her black cocker spaniel, on the grounds of Kensington Palace be sharply cut back once she’s walking with a stroller instead?
“We’re treading a tightrope all the time with the royal couple, and that’s only going to get thinner with the baby,” Palmer said. “One of the things we worry about is that we’re very unlikely to run snatched pictures of the baby in the coming months, but what happens if the Australians and the Americans do? When readers can go anywhere now, how will that hurt us?”
No comments:
Post a Comment