By Kelly Yamanouchi
Hartsfield-Jackson's
International Airport's new international terminal, now set to open in two
years, will be one of the first impressions of Atlanta or even the United
States for many travelers.
Making it
a good one is a challenge, especially when the airport is completing the
terminal under the pressure of tight budgets and issues involving the design,
negotiations with main tenant Delta Air Lines and bond financing.
The
international terminal, named for the late former Mayor Maynard H. Jackson Jr.,
is touted by the airport as the "new global gateway for the city of
Atlanta." It will consist of a terminal and a 12-gate concourse, totaling
1.2 million square feet and all connected to the existing airport on the end of
Concourse E, where most international flights now operate. That will provide
much more direct access for international passengers, who now must ride the
train from the main terminal.
A
rendering shows a spacious, open terminal with large skylights, trees and high
ceilings.
"It's
a very bright and airy space," said Hartsfield-Jackson assistant general
manager Dan Molloy, who oversees the international terminal project. "It
should be very pleasing and functional."
Design and cost a controversy
Photo from www.atlanta-airport.com |
Construction
of the basic terminal structure is nearly complete and the work on the interior
is beginning, following years of fighting over the design and cost of the
project.
An airport
plays a role in "communicating the community's image to the rest of the
world," said Jeff Loeschen of the Architectural Alliance at a recent
national symposium in Atlanta on airport planning, design and construction.
"It's a first and last impression."
But, said
airport manager Ben DeCosta,"We're all under the same pressure to meet the
demands of airlines for efficient projects and the demands of communities and
the demands of businesses."
The
original design in 2001 was for a $1.2 billion project, which was deemed too
expensive by the airport and Delta. The second design was originally estimated
to cost $983 million, including a giant glass wall with a view of the
Atlanta skyline, but that increased over the following years). The
airport eventually fired the design team, which then sued in a case that
continues today.
In the
second round of designs, Molloy said the airport was not looking to make a big
"architectural statement" with the building. "The first design
did have a bigger, larger facade overall," he said. "We did downsize
that, we simplified the glass curtain wall system." He said there will
still be a view of the city skyline.
Delta demanded changes
Airlines
-- which indirectly help pay for terminals through rents and fees -- have a big
stake in holding down costs. Delta more than a year ago demanded $400 million
in cuts to the international terminal project, which now is budgeted at
$1.35 billion today due to delays and reworking.
"The
changes we made are changes that will largely be invisible to the passenger,
but would result in us being able to get the facility for a little less
money," Molloy said. The design modifications included changes to the
design of the parking deck, for example.
Delta has
agreed to help the city seek bond financing for the project, an effort that the
airport has been working on for more than a year. The city expects to finally
go to market to sell bonds in the coming months.
Making Airport Attractive
It's not
the first time Hartsfield-Jackson has faced balancing utilitarian and
cost-effective with attractive and inviting.
The current
version of Atlanta's airport was designed in the 1970s and opened in the 1980s,
said Robert Kennedy, assistant general manager of operations at
Hartsfield-Jackson. Until the atrium was added to the main terminal in the
early 1990s, the design was very utilitarian, he said. Domestic concourses also
got makeovers to add a bit of style during the '90s.
"They
listened to the customers," Kennedy said of the atrium project.
This time,
Molloy said management is trying to serve both form and function from the
ground up.
"We
have a facility that is a very welcoming facility, one that will be a very good
front door to Atlanta (for) the rest of the world," he said. "At the
same time, we're being very cost-efficient, very cost-effective."
No comments:
Post a Comment